The punchline is that the interviewer hires a car salesman who’d sold brown cars with walnut interiors. Our hypothetical carpenter was effectively arguing that even if he’d only ever hammered together pine stud walls he could easily learn to do finish carpentry with walnut for a client very particular about his browns.
If learning this stuff is so easy, then I’d rather hire someone who understands what the goal is of finish carpentry.
I have no doubt that the industry is full of coders banging out one CRUD app after another, but their work bears a lot more relation to architects customizing a house design to a particular site (or, a better analogy, 19th-century railroad engineers applying the standard truss designs to design bridge after bridge) than it does to contractors framing house after house based on the designs they’re handed.
The exceptions—coders who really want nothing more than to follow some formula and take no responsibility for the result—are exactly who interviewers are trying to weed out.
” or “Tell me about some of your favorite projects.” but you’ve got to meet a weak interviewer in the middle. If you’re writing an order processing system open to the public, then you need to consider denial-of-service issues.
The main premise of this complaint about programming interviews is that a programmer is a programmer is a programmer, and the details don’t matter, and that’s straight-up bullshit. If the overall software system will be distributed, then the architecture needs to take rollout into consideration.
The more I think about an Apple car, the more I think that it might be the basis of their future “computing environment”: a space that is completely aware of and responsive to its occupant(s).
In that sense it might be more of a long-term competitor to the Amazon Echo (and whatever Android variant Google is pitching at the same space) than to Tesla’s cars. Three points for clarification: The old “What if they hired carpenters they way they hire programmers?
When Apple made a phone, it turned out it wasn’t really competing in the handset business; it was competing for the next dominant personal computing platform.Of course, there are carpenters who are creative craftsmen of the first order.Those aren’t the guys you’re going to bend over backwards to hire to frame your walls.Nobody seems to have a solution to separating the potential stars from the mehs, and anyone who claims they do either doesn’t have enough perspective to understand the difficulty of the problem (young interviewers who have been trained in one particular hiring style seem to be blessed with the arrogance of blind faith), or they’ve perfected the art of hiring the mediocre (a sufficiently rigorous process can probably rule out almost all the disastrous hires, but will likely also lose a few stars…and it’s finding the stars that is the problem).Pouting that interviews suck without suggesting any improvements is just childish, and doubly so if you’re complaining not about the bizarre “puzzle question” or “culture fit” interviews, but about being questioned on knowledge and experience.tente gemokgrandes tetas lefadas anonimas margaritablade and soul tribute cumming 6 times to keylamy young mistress sex after 5 yearsdecameron salinitaslerasdirty drag queen sucking cock video i likevideo bokep cewek perawan japan diperkosa sampai berdarahgerman real creampieshemale or girl real orgasm 40bolshoy chlenxxbftultepec hotelblow up and blow to pop nude kelsey obsessionbrazzers doctor adventures dr slutcunt tanya tate johnny sinspeludas espiadasdesi saree lady piss video10 Disclaimer: Zelo has a zero-tolerance policy against illegal pornography.